INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS AND INSTITUTIONAL WORK: SHOULD THEY BE AGREED?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

109 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the possibility of creating a more fruitful conversation between institutional logics and institutional work as two central streams within institutional theory. I begin by situating each of these lines of theorizing within their respective intellectual traditions. I then elaborate on their core arguments alongside their theoretical assumptions. Specifically, I articulate how they each highlight some aspects of institutional dynamics while disregarding or downplaying others. Finally, I point to some similarities, differences, and possible analytic division of labor between them. I conclude by arguing that the tension between institutional logics and institutional work, as two frameworks for conceptualizing and exploring institutional dynamics, is the most recent incarnation of a long series of theoretical conundrums within neo-institutionalism, each triggering deep and ongoing discussions that enriched our thinking. As such, this tension is welcome and important, as long as each stream is able to define its own boundaries.

Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationResearch in the Sociology of Organizations
PublisherEmerald Group Holdings Ltd.
Pages77-96
Number of pages20
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Publication series

NameResearch in the Sociology of Organizations
Volume39 Part A
ISSN (Print)0733-558X

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 by Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Keywords

  • Institutional logics
  • Institutional work

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS AND INSTITUTIONAL WORK: SHOULD THEY BE AGREED?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this