Abstract
In this paper, I discuss the possibility of creating a more fruitful conversation between institutional logics and institutional work as two central streams within institutional theory. I begin by situating each of these lines of theorizing within their respective intellectual traditions. I then elaborate on their core arguments alongside their theoretical assumptions. Specifically, I articulate how they each highlight some aspects of institutional dynamics while disregarding or downplaying others. Finally, I point to some similarities, differences, and possible analytic division of labor between them. I conclude by arguing that the tension between institutional logics and institutional work, as two frameworks for conceptualizing and exploring institutional dynamics, is the most recent incarnation of a long series of theoretical conundrums within neo-institutionalism, each triggering deep and ongoing discussions that enriched our thinking. As such, this tension is welcome and important, as long as each stream is able to define its own boundaries.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Research in the Sociology of Organizations |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing |
| Pages | 77-96 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2013 |
Publication series
| Name | Research in the Sociology of Organizations |
|---|---|
| Volume | 39 Part A |
| ISSN (Print) | 0733-558X |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2013 by Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Keywords
- Institutional logics
- Institutional work
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS AND INSTITUTIONAL WORK: SHOULD THEY BE AGREED?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver