TY - GEN
T1 - Instructor and course changes resulting from an HPL-inspired use of personal response systems
AU - Linsenmeier, Robert A.
AU - Olds, Suzanne A.
AU - Kolikant, Yifat Ben David
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Personal response systems (PRS) are beneficial because they can facilitate instruction that implements the theoretical framework of How People Learn (HPL), which emphasizes learner-, knowledge-, community-, and assessment-centered approaches. In this work we present case studies of moderately large biomedical engineering and biology courses. We discuss what types of questions and classroom strategies are effective in supporting HPL-inspired induction. A possibly unrecognized benefit of using a PRS system is its effect on instructors. We discuss the beneficial effects of PRS use on instructors and the changes in teaching strategies these systems brought about. The insight about the fragility of students' knowledge revealed by the PRS prompted the instructors to invest more time in designing formative assessment and in developing ways to address misconceptions. Use of the PRS also prompted the instructors to expand their instruction from merely content to include thought processes typical in their domain. Finally, the community of learners that was generated or reinforced by PRS had a positive effect on encouraging classroom discussion, and the instructors' teaching evolved to take advantage of that.
AB - Personal response systems (PRS) are beneficial because they can facilitate instruction that implements the theoretical framework of How People Learn (HPL), which emphasizes learner-, knowledge-, community-, and assessment-centered approaches. In this work we present case studies of moderately large biomedical engineering and biology courses. We discuss what types of questions and classroom strategies are effective in supporting HPL-inspired induction. A possibly unrecognized benefit of using a PRS system is its effect on instructors. We discuss the beneficial effects of PRS use on instructors and the changes in teaching strategies these systems brought about. The insight about the fragility of students' knowledge revealed by the PRS prompted the instructors to invest more time in designing formative assessment and in developing ways to address misconceptions. Use of the PRS also prompted the instructors to expand their instruction from merely content to include thought processes typical in their domain. Finally, the community of learners that was generated or reinforced by PRS had a positive effect on encouraging classroom discussion, and the instructors' teaching evolved to take advantage of that.
KW - Classroom communication systems
KW - Formative assessment
KW - PRS
KW - Pedagogy
KW - Personal response systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48749119518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/FIE.2006.322629
DO - 10.1109/FIE.2006.322629
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:48749119518
SN - 1424402565
SN - 9781424402564
T3 - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
SP - 16
EP - 21
BT - 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
Y2 - 28 October 2006 through 31 October 2006
ER -