Abstract
A diagnosis of an acute pulmonary embolism requires evaluation of risk factors and integration of clinical, laboratory and imaging tests. Clinical probability is determined using a validated prediction score, such as modified Wells or revised Geneva scores. D-dimer testing is recommended in patients with low or intermediate clinical probability, but should not be performed in high probability patients. A “PERC” approach (“pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria”) is recommended in low risk patients. Use of age adjusted D-dimer cut-off and variable D-dimer cut-off according to presence of risk factors, reduces the number of unnecessary imaging tests. High clinical probability patients and those with elevated D-dimer values should perform an imaging study, usually computerized tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or a radionuclide ventilation/perfusion scan.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Pulmonary Embolism |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| Pages | 119-128 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783030870904 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783030870898 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- CTPA
- Clinical probability
- D-dimer
- Integrated approach
- Pulmonary embolism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Integrating Clinical, Laboratory and Imaging Tests in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver