International examiners’ participation of the Viva: a ritual or an actual indicator of research quality?

Adam Nir*, Ronit Bogler

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


Purpose: Little is known about the impact external Viva examiners coming from the international community of scholars have on the quality of PhD research. This study aims to argue that the encounter between local and international examiners (IEs) is subject to various complexities, raising doubts about whether IEs’ participation and approval of the Viva may indicate for the quality of PhD research, and, therefore, serve to promote a university’s prestige. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative analysis of interviews conducted with IEs who served as examiners in six European countries, two African countries, two South American countries and one in the Commonwealth of Australia. Findings: Findings show that structural features, cultural qualities and personal contacts restrict IEs’ ability to introduce significant changes in students’ research, turning the Viva into a ritual with confined academic significance. Originality/value: The findings reveal that the Viva is mostly a ritual confined by structural and cultural barriers. While rituals are considered significant due to their consolidating and socializing functions, it appears that a Viva is mostly a ceremonial event that has little impact on the quality of PhD research or on shaping the research culture of the hosting universities according to international standards. Implications are further discussed.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)183-197
Number of pages15
JournalQuality Assurance in Education
Issue number2-3
StatePublished - 27 Sep 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.


  • Higher education
  • Policy
  • Quality assurance


Dive into the research topics of 'International examiners’ participation of the Viva: a ritual or an actual indicator of research quality?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this