TY - JOUR
T1 - Introducing the Emotions-Affect Systems Elicitation (EASEL-3) Index
T2 - A New Tool for Measuring Affect Regulation Systems' Activation
AU - the EASEL-3 research group
AU - Pinto, Ana Margarida
AU - Figueiredo, Claúdia
AU - Geenen, Rinie
AU - Castilho, Paula
AU - da Silva, José A P
AU - Morris, Eric M.J.
AU - Vanderhasselt, Marie Anne
AU - Kelly, Allison C.
AU - Naismith, Iona
AU - Ferreira, Nuno
AU - Barnow, Sven
AU - Eickhoff, Simon B.
AU - Lincoln, Tania
AU - Shahar, Ben
AU - Ottaviani, Cristina
AU - Petrocchi, Nicola
AU - Matthijssen, Suzy Johanna Martina Adriana
AU - van Middendorp, Henriët
AU - Wieser, Matthias J.
AU - Barros, Filipa
AU - Soares, Sandra C.
AU - Cunha, Marina
AU - Marques, Mariana
AU - Martins, Maria João
AU - Carona, Carlos
AU - da Silva, Diana Ribeiro
AU - Matos, Marcela
AU - Carvalho, Sérgio A.
AU - Carvalho, Célia Barreto
AU - Carvalho, Serafim
AU - Cunha, Carla
AU - Teixeira, Ricardo João
AU - Xavier, Ana
AU - Arriaga, Patrícia
AU - Extremera, Natalio
AU - Duarte, Joana
AU - Duarte, Cristiana
AU - Durkin, Mark
AU - Hastings, Stephanie
AU - Swales, Michaela
AU - Irons, Chris
AU - Pugh, Matthew
AU - Kotera, Yasuhiro
AU - Maratos, Frances A.
AU - McEwan, Kirsten
AU - Vickers, Jane
AU - Bardeen, Joseph
AU - Davis, Elizabeth L.
AU - Gaudiano, Brandon
AU - Lumley, Mark A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - Objective: Although emotions pervade and influence individual and interpersonal functioning and well-being, their nature and taxonomy remain a bone of contention. The ‘three-circle’ model, comprising three dynamically interacting affect regulation systems (i.e., threat, drive, and soothing), provides a useful framework for aggregating emotions and understanding emotion (dys)regulation while closely supporting therapeutic intervention. Imbalances in the activation and (inter)action of these affect regulation systems have been implicated in a wide range of physical and mental disorders; however, there are currently no tools for quantifying each system's activation. The aim of this study was to develop a novel index of the three affect regulation systems: threat, drive and soothing. Method: Three independent expert panels, composed of researchers in the ‘three-circle’ model, researchers in the field of affective science, and clinicians (N = 70), estimated the degree of activation of each affect regulation system induced by discrete emotions. Results: Overall, agreement among experts was high regarding the emotions that mapped primarily onto each affect regulation system and the degree of the corresponding activation. These results constitute the basis for the Emotions-Affect Systems ELicitation Index (EASEL-3) index, which provides a continuous score of the estimated activation of the three systems. Conclusion and Discussion: Although in need of field testing, the EASEL-3 index may prove valuable in research and clinical settings, opening new avenues on the measurement of the affect regulation systems, their correlates and associated outcomes, helping characterize and compare activation patterns across clinical populations and contexts, and informing the assessment and personalization of interventions.
AB - Objective: Although emotions pervade and influence individual and interpersonal functioning and well-being, their nature and taxonomy remain a bone of contention. The ‘three-circle’ model, comprising three dynamically interacting affect regulation systems (i.e., threat, drive, and soothing), provides a useful framework for aggregating emotions and understanding emotion (dys)regulation while closely supporting therapeutic intervention. Imbalances in the activation and (inter)action of these affect regulation systems have been implicated in a wide range of physical and mental disorders; however, there are currently no tools for quantifying each system's activation. The aim of this study was to develop a novel index of the three affect regulation systems: threat, drive and soothing. Method: Three independent expert panels, composed of researchers in the ‘three-circle’ model, researchers in the field of affective science, and clinicians (N = 70), estimated the degree of activation of each affect regulation system induced by discrete emotions. Results: Overall, agreement among experts was high regarding the emotions that mapped primarily onto each affect regulation system and the degree of the corresponding activation. These results constitute the basis for the Emotions-Affect Systems ELicitation Index (EASEL-3) index, which provides a continuous score of the estimated activation of the three systems. Conclusion and Discussion: Although in need of field testing, the EASEL-3 index may prove valuable in research and clinical settings, opening new avenues on the measurement of the affect regulation systems, their correlates and associated outcomes, helping characterize and compare activation patterns across clinical populations and contexts, and informing the assessment and personalization of interventions.
KW - Emotions-Affect Systems ELicitation (EASEL-3) index
KW - emotions
KW - expert panels
KW - measurement
KW - ‘three-circle’ model
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012911128
U2 - 10.1002/cpp.70126
DO - 10.1002/cpp.70126
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 40754842
AN - SCOPUS:105012911128
SN - 1063-3995
VL - 32
JO - Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy
JF - Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy
IS - 4
M1 - e70126
ER -