Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Stavros Ioannidis*
  • , Gal Vishne
  • , Meir Hemmo
  • , Orly Shenker
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this introductory chapter we present some central philosophical views and problems about the notion of levels of reality that will be further explored in the chapters of this volume. We point out that the question whether reality has a multi-level structure is a deep philosophical issue with widespread implications for how we think about central problems in philosophy and science. We emphasise the many aspects of the notion of levels, distinguish between ontological levels (where levels are used as a way to talk about the hierarchical structure of the world) and epistemological levels (where levels have primarily a methodological and epistemological role) and explore their complex relationship. We also discuss the general reasons offered by non-reductive physicalists to adopt a metaphysics of a multi-level reality and whether the levels described by such accounts of the special sciences can be part of a physicalist ontology.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages1-10
Number of pages10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Publication series

NameJerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science
VolumePart F11855
ISSN (Print)2524-4248
ISSN (Electronic)2524-4256

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

Keywords

  • Epistemological vs. ontological levels
  • Flat ontology
  • Layered model
  • Levels of reality
  • Levels pluralism
  • Levels skepticism
  • Multi-level ontology
  • Multiple realizability
  • Non-reductive physicalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Introduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this