TY - JOUR
T1 - Is knowledge a barrier to implementing low back pain guidelines? Assessing the knowledge of Israeli family doctors
AU - Dahan, Rachel
AU - Reis, Shmuel
AU - Borkan, Jeffry
AU - Brown, Judith Bell
AU - Hermoni, Doron
AU - Mansor, Nadia
AU - Harris, Stewart
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - Objectives: To measure knowledge of Israeli low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines among different subgroups of primary care doctors, prior to designing an intervention programme to enhance guideline adherence in practice. Study design: Confidential mailed survey questionnaire. Setting: Family practices in the Haifa and western Galilee district, Israel. Participants: Random sample of 163 primary care doctors. A total of 134 doctors (82%) completed the questionnaire. Main outcome measures: A Multiple Choice Questionnaire measuring knowledge of the LBP guidelines. Instrument reliability and inter-item reliability were tested in a pilot phase. Content validity was assured by having the Israeli LBP guideline authors involved in a consensus procedure. Results: Distribution of test scores significantly differentiated professional levels and background variables, demonstrating the instrument reliability. Cronbach's alpha was above 0.91. The average test score was 67.7 [standard deviation (SD) 16.2], family doctors had average scores of 75.2 (SD 9.8), general practitioners (GPs) 57.9 (SD 19) and family practice residents 67.4 (SD 13.2). The difference between the test average scores of family doctors, GPs and residents was significant (P < 0.001). Significant differences were also found for specific variables including the doctor's age, country of medical training and self-report familiarity with the LBP guidelines. Conclusions: Striking differences exist between subgroups of primary care doctors regarding their knowledge of LBP guidelines. These differences will require the design of multiple interventions tailored to each subgroup.
AB - Objectives: To measure knowledge of Israeli low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines among different subgroups of primary care doctors, prior to designing an intervention programme to enhance guideline adherence in practice. Study design: Confidential mailed survey questionnaire. Setting: Family practices in the Haifa and western Galilee district, Israel. Participants: Random sample of 163 primary care doctors. A total of 134 doctors (82%) completed the questionnaire. Main outcome measures: A Multiple Choice Questionnaire measuring knowledge of the LBP guidelines. Instrument reliability and inter-item reliability were tested in a pilot phase. Content validity was assured by having the Israeli LBP guideline authors involved in a consensus procedure. Results: Distribution of test scores significantly differentiated professional levels and background variables, demonstrating the instrument reliability. Cronbach's alpha was above 0.91. The average test score was 67.7 [standard deviation (SD) 16.2], family doctors had average scores of 75.2 (SD 9.8), general practitioners (GPs) 57.9 (SD 19) and family practice residents 67.4 (SD 13.2). The difference between the test average scores of family doctors, GPs and residents was significant (P < 0.001). Significant differences were also found for specific variables including the doctor's age, country of medical training and self-report familiarity with the LBP guidelines. Conclusions: Striking differences exist between subgroups of primary care doctors regarding their knowledge of LBP guidelines. These differences will require the design of multiple interventions tailored to each subgroup.
KW - Barriers to changing doctor behaviour
KW - Clinical practice guideline
KW - Low back pain
KW - Primary care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55349100238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00847.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00847.x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 18373587
AN - SCOPUS:55349100238
SN - 1356-1294
VL - 14
SP - 785
EP - 791
JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
IS - 5
ER -