Is Regional Anesthesia Safer than General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section?

Yehuda Ginosar; Ian F. Russell; Stephen H. Halpern

doi:10.1002/9780470988343.ch11

Is Regional Anesthesia Safer than General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section?

Yehuda Ginosar^*, Ian F. Russell, Stephen H. Halpern

^*Corresponding author for this work

Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada (IMRIC)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Evidence-based Obstetric Anesthesia
Publisher	Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Pages	108-131
Number of pages	24
ISBN (Print)	9780727917348
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470988343.ch11
State	Published - 12 Nov 2007

Keywords

Acute and chronic post-cesarean section pain
General anesthesia
Maternal mortality
Morbid obesity
Regional anesthesia

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1002/9780470988343.ch11

Cite this

@inbook{ad39ad196f904e09931287bf90e94fdf,

title = "Is Regional Anesthesia Safer than General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section?",

keywords = "Acute and chronic post-cesarean section pain, General anesthesia, Maternal mortality, Morbid obesity, Regional anesthesia",

author = "Yehuda Ginosar and Russell, {Ian F.} and Halpern, {Stephen H.}",

year = "2007",

month = nov,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1002/9780470988343.ch11",

language = "אנגלית",

isbn = "9780727917348",

pages = "108--131",