Abstract
Israel had a closed list PR system that was so proportional that it resulted in a large multiparty system with a very fragmented parliament. One result is that for decades, Israel experienced difficulties in building and maintaining large coalition governments, often containing several small and more extreme parties, which can and do yield blackmail powers. The failure to reform the actual electoral system led to misguided attempts at institutional engineering. Reformers attempted to alleviate some of the effects of the electoral system by adopting party primaries and directly electing the prime minister. However, the unintended consequences of these reforms were immediate. Primaries undermined party discipline, while the direct election of the Prime Minister made the problem of sustaining coalition governments worse than before the reform. Israel has since returned to a 'single-ballot' system.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The politics of electoral systems |
Editors | Michael Gallagher, Paul Mitchell |
Place of Publication | Oxford |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Chapter | 16 |
Pages | 333–352 |
Number of pages | 20 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191603280 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780199257560 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Feb 2006 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Oxford University Press, 2014.
Keywords
- Closed list pr
- Direct election
- Electoral reform
- Polarization
- Single nationwide district
- Split-ticket voting
- Volatility