TY - JOUR
T1 - It takes a village to build illegality
T2 - Minorities' noncompliance as manifestation of distrust
AU - Gofen, Anat
AU - Cohen-Blankshtain, Galit
AU - Ibraheem, Maram
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Often portrayed as social resistance fueled by authorities' discrimination and legal racism, minorities' noncompliance is considered to undermine the current order and commonly ascribed to distrust in government. To better understand noncompliance as a manifestation of distrust, this article focuses on the well-documented violation of planning, building, and property laws among the Israeli-Arab minority, who consistently exemplify distrust in government. Differing from current research, our analysis explores what facilitates noncompliance on-the-ground, draws on face-to-face interviews with 30 Arab-Israeli offenders who built their houses illegally, and uses the noncompliant behavior as the unit of analysis. In contrast to the common idiosyncratic portrayal of noncompliance, illegal building emerged as depending on a threefold collective effort: institutional, social, and practical. Uncovering collective support mechanisms for noncompliance suggests that distrust in government is compensated by trust in informal arrangements, thus raising new dilemmas around where personal responsibilities end and public ones begin.
AB - Often portrayed as social resistance fueled by authorities' discrimination and legal racism, minorities' noncompliance is considered to undermine the current order and commonly ascribed to distrust in government. To better understand noncompliance as a manifestation of distrust, this article focuses on the well-documented violation of planning, building, and property laws among the Israeli-Arab minority, who consistently exemplify distrust in government. Differing from current research, our analysis explores what facilitates noncompliance on-the-ground, draws on face-to-face interviews with 30 Arab-Israeli offenders who built their houses illegally, and uses the noncompliant behavior as the unit of analysis. In contrast to the common idiosyncratic portrayal of noncompliance, illegal building emerged as depending on a threefold collective effort: institutional, social, and practical. Uncovering collective support mechanisms for noncompliance suggests that distrust in government is compensated by trust in informal arrangements, thus raising new dilemmas around where personal responsibilities end and public ones begin.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089958851&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/gove.12528
DO - 10.1111/gove.12528
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85089958851
SN - 0952-1895
VL - 34
SP - 983
EP - 1000
JO - Governance
JF - Governance
IS - 4
ER -