Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Jewish social workers in mandatory palestine: Between submission and subversion under male leadership

  • Ayana Halpern*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article examines relations between the first social workers in the Yishuv - the Jewish community in Mandatory Palestine (1918-1948) - and their male leadership, with emphasis on the decade between 1930 and 1940. It sheds light on the gender conflict between male administrative leaders and female service providers and the tension between social work as an arm of the nation state and as a tool of social activism. Feminist methodology and a qualitative analysis yield the following themes: (1) the social workers' gender approach; (2) their perception by men; and (3) the conflicts involved in their multifaceted dynamics with the Zionist establishment. The findings indicate that social workers operated at the interface between the interests of the establishment and those of their clients. With their commitment to nation-building, their professional principles and their concern for women's rights and social justice, these pioneers blazed a trail to female independence and public activism, while at the same time remaining committed and subordinate to a gender discourse dominated by men and national values.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-96
Number of pages23
JournalNashim
Issue number35
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Indiana University Press. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Jewish social workers in mandatory palestine: Between submission and subversion under male leadership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this