The combined impact of ownership form, economic regulation and competition on airport performance is analyzed using data envelopment analysis to measure cost efficiency in the first stage and regression analysis to measure the impact of the environment in the second stage. The empirical results of an analysis of European and Australian airports over a 10. year timeframe reveal that under relatively non-competitive conditions, public airports operate less cost efficiently than fully private airports. Irrespective of ownership form, regulation is necessary to emulate competitive forces thus pushing airport management towards cost efficiency and reasonable pricing policies. Under potential regional or hub competition, economic regulation inhibits airports of any ownership form from operating and pricing efficiently. Although public and fully private airports operate equally efficiently in a competitive setting, private airports still set higher aeronautical charges. Furthermore, mixed ownership forms with a majority public holding are neither cost efficient nor low price, irrespective of the level of competition.
|Original language||American English|
|Number of pages||18|
|Journal||Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice|
|State||Published - Jun 2014|
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
We would like to thank the German Airport Performance research project funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research for providing the data. Further, we thank Prof. David Gillen, Prof. Hans-Martin Niemeier, and the participants of the World Bank roundtable on Transport Productivity in February 2010, the German Aviation Research Society Conference in November 2010 and the Aviation seminar at the University of British Columbia in February 2011 for fruitful discussions. Nicole Adler thanks the Recanati Fund for partial funding of this research.
- Airport efficiency
- Data envelopment analysis
- Ownership form