Judiciary independence: Why should conservation ecologists care?

Tamar Keasar, Moshe Coll, Yael Lubin, Michal Segoli, Saskya van Nouhuys, Eric Wajnberg, Alon Tal*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We discuss the impact of democratic political governance systems on ecological and conservation research, education, and practice, focusing on radical proposed changes to the judicial system in Israel. This judicial reform has already begun to restrict academic freedom and environmental laws, adversely affecting regulatory actions. We are concerned about the weakening enforcement of environmental laws, increased power to polluting industries, future defunding of ecological research and nature conservation programs, reduced cross-border collaborations in ecological research, and restrictions on the academic teaching of ecology and evolution. Concerns related to Israel's unique biodiversity are particularly pressing in light of the constant threats from a rapidly growing population, high development pressures, and frequent military actions. International experience suggests that weakening judicial oversight of government actions in other countries is generating similar threats on a global scale. Therefore, ecologists and conservation biologists should actively be involved in the protection of liberal democracies and judicial independence.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70014
JournalConservation Science and Practice
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords

  • conservation
  • democracy
  • ecological research
  • evolution
  • Israel
  • judicial revision

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Judiciary independence: Why should conservation ecologists care?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this