Killing for knowledge

Tzachi Zamir*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

I distinguish between four arguments commonly used to justify experimentation on animals (I). After delineating the autonomy of the question of experiments from other topics within animal ethics (II), I examine and reject each of these justifications (III–VI). I then explore two arguments according to which animal-dependent experimentation should continue even if it is immoral (VII). I close with the way in which liberationists’ strategic considerations modify the moral conclusions of my analysis.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)17-40
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Applied Philosophy
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2006

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Society for Applied Philosophy, 2006.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Killing for knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this