Large cardinals and definable counterexamples to the continuum hypothesis

Matthew Foreman*, Menachem Magidor

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper we consider whether L(R) has "enough information" to contain a counterexample to the continuum hypothesis. We believe this question provides deep insight into the difficulties surrounding the continuum hypothesis. We show sufficient conditions for L(R) not to contain such a counterexample. Along the way we establish many results about nonstationary towers, non-reflecting stationary sets, generalizations of proper and semiproper forcing and Chang's conjecture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-97
Number of pages51
JournalAnnals of Pure and Applied Logic
Volume76
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Nov 1995

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Large cardinals and definable counterexamples to the continuum hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this