Abstract
In this paper we consider whether L(R) has "enough information" to contain a counterexample to the continuum hypothesis. We believe this question provides deep insight into the difficulties surrounding the continuum hypothesis. We show sufficient conditions for L(R) not to contain such a counterexample. Along the way we establish many results about nonstationary towers, non-reflecting stationary sets, generalizations of proper and semiproper forcing and Chang's conjecture.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 47-97 |
| Number of pages | 51 |
| Journal | Annals of Pure and Applied Logic |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 15 Nov 1995 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Large cardinals and definable counterexamples to the continuum hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver