Abstract
An attempt is made to explicate a microcoherency property, i.e., the property of being an acceptable unit of some textual level. It is assumed that a text (T) is acceptable (= microcoherent) if a question-and-answer type pragmatic complement is available. A formal procedure for structuring a textwise continuous unity (extended text-ET) of the surface T and its pragmatic complement is developed. Every semantic connection in T is to be ‘proved’ by commonsense postulates constituting the pragmatic complement; ET is a set of pragmatic proofs for every implicit semantic connection. ET may be used as a working basis for an explanatory model applicable to the diverse phenomena of text performance, e.g., to the generation of specific word meanings by a context. A contextual meaning of a word arises as a result of interaction between words and word phrases involved in explicit as well as implicit semantic connections. Hence, any contextual meaning may be represented by an appropriate excerption from ET.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 279-313 |
| Number of pages | 35 |
| Journal | Text |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1981 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Latent coherence, contextual meanings, and the interpretation of a text'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver