Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Latent coherence, contextual meanings, and the interpretation of a text

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

An attempt is made to explicate a microcoherency property, i.e., the property of being an acceptable unit of some textual level. It is assumed that a text (T) is acceptable (= microcoherent) if a question-and-answer type pragmatic complement is available. A formal procedure for structuring a textwise continuous unity (extended text-ET) of the surface T and its pragmatic complement is developed. Every semantic connection in T is to be ‘proved’ by commonsense postulates constituting the pragmatic complement; ET is a set of pragmatic proofs for every implicit semantic connection. ET may be used as a working basis for an explanatory model applicable to the diverse phenomena of text performance, e.g., to the generation of specific word meanings by a context. A contextual meaning of a word arises as a result of interaction between words and word phrases involved in explicit as well as implicit semantic connections. Hence, any contextual meaning may be represented by an appropriate excerption from ET.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-313
Number of pages35
JournalText
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Latent coherence, contextual meanings, and the interpretation of a text'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this