Learning the 'How' of the Law: Teaching Procedure and Legal Education

David Bamford, Trevor C.W. Farrow*, Michael Karayanni, Erik S. Knutsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article examines the approaches to teaching civil procedure in five common law jurisdictions (Canada, Australia, United States, Israel, and England). The paper demonstrates the important transition of civil procedure from a vocational oriented subject to a rigorous intellectual study of policies, processes, and values underpinning our civil justice system, and analysis of how that system operates. The advantages and disadvantages of where civil procedure fits within the curriculum are discussed and the significant opportunities for ‘active’ learning are highlighted. The inclusion of England where civil procedure is not taught to any significant degree in the law degree provides a valuable comparator. Common findings from the other jurisdictions suggest that teaching civil procedure enhances the curriculum by bringing it closer to what lawyers actually do as well as enabling a better understanding of the development of doctrinal law.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-91
Number of pages47
JournalOsgoode Hall Law Journal
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2013

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2013, York University Osgoode Hall Law School. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Canada
  • Civil procedure-Study and teaching
  • England
  • Israel
  • Law-Study and teaching
  • United States

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Learning the 'How' of the Law: Teaching Procedure and Legal Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this