TY - JOUR
T1 - Legal Maxims (qawā'id fiqhiyya) in Yūsuf al-Qaradāwī's Jurisprudence and Fatwas
AU - Shaham, Ron
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Oriental Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Subsequent to the crystallization of the legal schools, Muslim jurists felt the need to consolidate the massive corpus of legal opinion in order to aid students and practitioners of the law. The result was legal maxims (qawā'id fiqhiyya), concise theoretical statements that captured the objectives of the Sharia. An example is al-darar yuzāl ("Harm must be removed"), which is based on the hadith lā darar wa-lā dirār. This article analyzes the role of legal maxims in Yūsuf al-Qaradā wī's (b. 1926 in Egypt) jurisprudence and fatwas, as found in his numerous books and articles. Its preliminary assumption is that Qaradā wī uses legal maxims to control and systematize the use of considerations of public welfare (maslaha), especially in the field of "the jurisprudence of reality" (fiqh al-wāqi'). Because this fiqh deals mainly with political topics on which there are hardly any guidelines in scripture, and stems therefore from mostly nontextual benefits (masālih mursala), it is an area vulnerable to undisciplined use of utilitarian considerations by jurists. Legal maxims then come in handy when weighing the relevant benefit and harm related to each topic.
AB - Subsequent to the crystallization of the legal schools, Muslim jurists felt the need to consolidate the massive corpus of legal opinion in order to aid students and practitioners of the law. The result was legal maxims (qawā'id fiqhiyya), concise theoretical statements that captured the objectives of the Sharia. An example is al-darar yuzāl ("Harm must be removed"), which is based on the hadith lā darar wa-lā dirār. This article analyzes the role of legal maxims in Yūsuf al-Qaradā wī's (b. 1926 in Egypt) jurisprudence and fatwas, as found in his numerous books and articles. Its preliminary assumption is that Qaradā wī uses legal maxims to control and systematize the use of considerations of public welfare (maslaha), especially in the field of "the jurisprudence of reality" (fiqh al-wāqi'). Because this fiqh deals mainly with political topics on which there are hardly any guidelines in scripture, and stems therefore from mostly nontextual benefits (masālih mursala), it is an area vulnerable to undisciplined use of utilitarian considerations by jurists. Legal maxims then come in handy when weighing the relevant benefit and harm related to each topic.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143544390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0435
DO - 10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0435
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85143544390
SN - 0003-0279
VL - 140
SP - 435
EP - 453
JO - Journal of the American Oriental Society
JF - Journal of the American Oriental Society
IS - 2
ER -