Abstract
This article is written in the memory of Marcelo Dascal, and is conceived as an imaginary answer to a question put by him to the author: what is the point – given a shared non-religious, even atheistic, outlook – in translating (into the Hebrew) of Leibniz’s Théodicée? The two main theses of this imagined answer are: 1. That there is in the Théodicée a moral theory, partly implicit but irreducible and relatively independent of its theological content, and that this theory is based on a paradoxical – but original and important – concept of moral necessity, extracted from the theory of the absolute need to choose the best possible; 2. That this concept of moral necessity may be developed into a theory of responsibility, looking back to the need to give accounts about what has been done (or not done), and forward, to what has to be done (or not) now.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 163-183 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Studia Leibnitiana |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 FRANZ STEINER VERLAG GMBH. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- choosing the best
- Leibniz
- Marcelo Dascal
- moral necessity
- moral theory
- theory of responsibility
- Théodicée