Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Levels of Reality and Levels of Description

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The assumption of the causal closure of the fundamental level of reality has been used to support reductionism and undermine non-reductive views such as Davidson’s anomalous monism. Jaegwon Kim, in particular, devoted numerous papers to this line of critique, arguing that the stratification of reality into distinct levels is incompatible with the causal closure assumption. Taking issue with Kim’s position, my chapter seeks to show that the stratified picture is both safe and useful from the scientific point of view. The defense of non-reductive physicalism requires a clear distinction between levels of reality and levels of description, a distinction that counter-arguments (such as Kim’s) tend to blur.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages11-25
Number of pages15
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Publication series

NameJerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science
VolumePart F11855
ISSN (Print)2524-4248
ISSN (Electronic)2524-4256

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

Keywords

  • Anomalous monism
  • Donald Davidson
  • Jaegwon Kim
  • Laws
  • Levels of description
  • Non-reductive physicalism
  • Reduction
  • Statistical mechanics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Levels of Reality and Levels of Description'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this