Levinthal's question revisited, and answered

Arieh Ben-Naim*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

Attempts to answer the Levinthal question "How proteins fold to give such a unique structure" are discussed. In the first part of this article, we focus on a few reasons as to why the solution to the protein-folding problem (PFP) has been elusive for a very long time. One is a result of the misinterpretation of Anfinsen's Thermodynamic hypothesis which led to the conclusion that the native structure of a protein must be at a global minimum of the Gibbs energy. The second is the result of the adherence to the hydrophobic paradigm, and at the same time ignoring a whole repertoire of hydrophilic effects. It is argued that switching from a target-based to a caused-based approach, and adopting the hydrophilic paradigm leads straightforwardly to a simple answer to Levinthal's question, as well as to a solution of the PFP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-124
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Anfinsen's hypothesis
  • Hydrophilic effects
  • Hydrophilic forces
  • Hydrophobic
  • Levinthal's question
  • Protein folding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Levinthal's question revisited, and answered'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this