Abstract
Experimental studies investigating logical reasoning performance show very high error rates of up to 80% and more. Previous research identified scalar inferences of the sentences of logical arguments as a major error source. We present new analytical tools to quantify the impact of scalar inferences on syllogistic reasoning. Our proposal builds on a new classification of Aristotelian syllogisms and a closely linked classification of reasoning behaviors/strategies. We argue that the variation in error rates across syllogistic reasoning tasks is in part due to individual variation: reasoners follow different reasoning strategies and these strategies play out differently for syllogisms of different classes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | NICS 2018 - Proceedings of 2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science |
Editors | Ho Tu Bao, Le Anh Cuong, Ho Van Khuong, Bui Thu Lam |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
Pages | 305-310 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781538679838 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 9 Jan 2019 |
Event | 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science, NICS 2018 - Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam Duration: 23 Nov 2018 → 24 Nov 2018 |
Publication series
Name | NICS 2018 - Proceedings of 2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science |
---|
Conference
Conference | 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science, NICS 2018 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Viet Nam |
City | Ho Chi Minh City |
Period | 23/11/18 → 24/11/18 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 IEEE.
Keywords
- Individual variation
- Reasoning errors
- Scalar inferences
- Syllogisms