TY - JOUR
T1 - Listening is Listening is Listening
T2 - Employees’ Perception of Listening as a Holistic Phenomenon
AU - Lipetz, Liora
AU - Kluger, Avraham N.
AU - Bodie, Graham D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©, © International Listening Association.
PY - 2020/5/3
Y1 - 2020/5/3
N2 - Interpersonal listening research is marked by a wealth of conceptual definitions and measurement instruments, with a consensus about neither. Therefore, we sought to discover how laypeople, rather than theoreticians, construe listening, and to construct a scale that reflects these perceptions. In Study 1, laypeople listed the features and characteristics of interpersonal listening in four different contexts (general, romantic, colleague-to-colleague, and manager–subordinate). In Study 2, a second sample of individuals rated the centrality of the features found in Study 1 for the definition of listening. These centrality ratings were similar to the frequency of good-listening features in Study 1. In Study 3, we used the features identified in Study 1 and 2 and asked a sample of employees to rate each one regarding their experience with their supervisor or one of their work colleagues listening to them. These ratings yielded a single factor. Thus, we conclude that, although people can describe the complexities of listening, they seem to perceive it as a holistic and unitary experience. Practically, a small set of good items pertaining to perceptions of listening may yield an acceptable, or even excellent, unidimensional reliability estimate.
AB - Interpersonal listening research is marked by a wealth of conceptual definitions and measurement instruments, with a consensus about neither. Therefore, we sought to discover how laypeople, rather than theoreticians, construe listening, and to construct a scale that reflects these perceptions. In Study 1, laypeople listed the features and characteristics of interpersonal listening in four different contexts (general, romantic, colleague-to-colleague, and manager–subordinate). In Study 2, a second sample of individuals rated the centrality of the features found in Study 1 for the definition of listening. These centrality ratings were similar to the frequency of good-listening features in Study 1. In Study 3, we used the features identified in Study 1 and 2 and asked a sample of employees to rate each one regarding their experience with their supervisor or one of their work colleagues listening to them. These ratings yielded a single factor. Thus, we conclude that, although people can describe the complexities of listening, they seem to perceive it as a holistic and unitary experience. Practically, a small set of good items pertaining to perceptions of listening may yield an acceptable, or even excellent, unidimensional reliability estimate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052107037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10904018.2018.1497489
DO - 10.1080/10904018.2018.1497489
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85052107037
SN - 1090-4018
VL - 34
SP - 71
EP - 96
JO - International Journal of Listening
JF - International Journal of Listening
IS - 2
ER -