Abstract
Interpersonal listening research is marked by a wealth of conceptual definitions and measurement instruments, with a consensus about neither. Therefore, we sought to discover how laypeople, rather than theoreticians, construe listening, and to construct a scale that reflects these perceptions. In Study 1, laypeople listed the features and characteristics of interpersonal listening in four different contexts (general, romantic, colleague-to-colleague, and manager–subordinate). In Study 2, a second sample of individuals rated the centrality of the features found in Study 1 for the definition of listening. These centrality ratings were similar to the frequency of good-listening features in Study 1. In Study 3, we used the features identified in Study 1 and 2 and asked a sample of employees to rate each one regarding their experience with their supervisor or one of their work colleagues listening to them. These ratings yielded a single factor. Thus, we conclude that, although people can describe the complexities of listening, they seem to perceive it as a holistic and unitary experience. Practically, a small set of good items pertaining to perceptions of listening may yield an acceptable, or even excellent, unidimensional reliability estimate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 71-96 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | International Journal of Listening |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 3 May 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:©, © International Listening Association.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Listening is Listening is Listening: Employees’ Perception of Listening as a Holistic Phenomenon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver