Abstract
We prove that the statement “for every infinite cardinal κ, every graph with list-chromatic number κ has coloring number at most ℶω (κ)” proved by Kojman (2014) using the RGCH theorem implies the WRGCH theorem, which is a weaker relative of the RGCH, via a short forcing argument. Similarly, a better upper bound than ℶω (κ) in this statement implies stronger (consistent) forms of the WRGCH theorem, the consistency of whose negations is wide open. Thus, the optimality of Kojman’s upper bound is a purely cardinal arithmetic problem, and, as discussed below, is hard to decide.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5371-5383 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society |
| Volume | 144 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 American Mathematical Society.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Lower bounds on coloring numbers from hardness hypotheses in PCF theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver