TY - JOUR
T1 - Magnetic resonance imaging system for intraoperative margin assessment for DCIS and invasive breast cancer using the ClearSight™ system in breast-conserving surgery—Results from a postmarketing study
AU - Thill, Marc
AU - Szwarcfiter, Iris
AU - Kelling, Katharina
AU - van Haasteren, Viviane
AU - Kolka, Eyal
AU - Noelke, Josefa
AU - Peles, Zachi
AU - Papa, Moshe
AU - Aulmann, Sebastian
AU - Allweis, Tanir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Background and objectives: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is followed by reoperations in approximately 25%. Reoperations lead to an increased risk of infection and wound healing problems as well as a worse cosmetic outcome. Several technical approaches for an intraoperative margin assessment to decrease the reoperation rate are under evaluation, some of them are still experimental. Methods: A prospective single-arm post-marketing study with 60 patients undergoing BCS for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer was conducted. The specimen was intraoperatively examined by the ClearSight™ system, a mobile magnetic resonance imaging system that is based on a diffusion-weighted imaging protocol. However, the results were blinded to the surgeon. Results: The ClearSight™ system was performed for both ductal and lobular breast cancer and DCIS, with a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–0.96) and a specificity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.72–0.92), with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 80%. Conclusion: Had the ClearSight™ been known to the surgeon intraoperatively, the reoperation rate would have been reduced by 83% for invasive carcinoma, from 10% to 2%, and 50% for DCIS, from 30% to 15% reoperations. A trial designed to examine the impact on reoperation rates is currently ongoing.
AB - Background and objectives: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is followed by reoperations in approximately 25%. Reoperations lead to an increased risk of infection and wound healing problems as well as a worse cosmetic outcome. Several technical approaches for an intraoperative margin assessment to decrease the reoperation rate are under evaluation, some of them are still experimental. Methods: A prospective single-arm post-marketing study with 60 patients undergoing BCS for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer was conducted. The specimen was intraoperatively examined by the ClearSight™ system, a mobile magnetic resonance imaging system that is based on a diffusion-weighted imaging protocol. However, the results were blinded to the surgeon. Results: The ClearSight™ system was performed for both ductal and lobular breast cancer and DCIS, with a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–0.96) and a specificity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.72–0.92), with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 80%. Conclusion: Had the ClearSight™ been known to the surgeon intraoperatively, the reoperation rate would have been reduced by 83% for invasive carcinoma, from 10% to 2%, and 50% for DCIS, from 30% to 15% reoperations. A trial designed to examine the impact on reoperation rates is currently ongoing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118298329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jso.26721
DO - 10.1002/jso.26721
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34724205
AN - SCOPUS:85118298329
SN - 0022-4790
VL - 125
SP - 361
EP - 368
JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 3
ER -