Abstract
This chapter describes the failure of Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to modernize routine managerial tasks involved in academic administration. It argues that most universities maintain traditional decision-making procedures in regards to hiring, promotions, preparation of annual reports, and submission of portfolios for accreditation and assessment. I argue that developers of CRIS programs failed to appreciate the tasks of academic management. At the same time, management teams seem reluctant to change traditional academic practices. I discuss reasons for this disconnect and suggest ways to close the gap so as to modernize academic decision-making in universities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | International Series in Operations Research and Management Science |
Publisher | Springer |
Pages | 117-130 |
Number of pages | 14 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
Publication series
Name | International Series in Operations Research and Management Science |
---|---|
Volume | 309 |
ISSN (Print) | 0884-8289 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2214-7934 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Keywords
- Academic management
- Current Research Information Systems (CRIS)
- Higher education