TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanisms underlying interoceptive exposure
T2 - belief disconfirmation or extinction? A preliminary study
AU - Ginat-Frolich, Rivkah
AU - Kara-Ivanov, Anna
AU - Strauss, Asher Y.
AU - Myers, Ayelet
AU - Huppert, Jonathan D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Swedish Association for Behaviour Therapy.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Interoceptive exposure, or exposure to one’s feared physical sensations, has been shown to be an important technique in cognitive behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders and related constructs, such as anxiety sensitivity (AS). The current study sought to further clarify the underlying cognitive-behavioral mechanisms of interoceptive exposure in a lab-based, analog study with individuals high in AS. Participants (n = 59) were randomized into three groups: a cognitive-behavioral intervention emphasizing belief disconfirmation (CbI), a behavioral intervention emphasizing exposure (BI), and a control condition. Self-report measures assessing AS, catastrophizing of bodily sensations, and subjective units of distress (SUDS) were collected before, during and after the intervention. Participants also completed online questionnaires at a one-month follow-up. Following the CbI but not BI, a decrease was observed in both AS and catastrophizing interpretations. Furthermore, only the CbI group exhibited a decrease in SUDS ratings, whereas the BI group exhibited a significant increase. Notably, these effects were not maintained at a one-month follow-up. Findings suggest that cognitive interventions without repeated behavioral exposure may be sufficient in reducing self-reported anxiety-related symptoms and catastrophic misinterpretations, though not at maintaining them. This raises questions regarding the role of pure behavioral mechanisms in exposure.
AB - Interoceptive exposure, or exposure to one’s feared physical sensations, has been shown to be an important technique in cognitive behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders and related constructs, such as anxiety sensitivity (AS). The current study sought to further clarify the underlying cognitive-behavioral mechanisms of interoceptive exposure in a lab-based, analog study with individuals high in AS. Participants (n = 59) were randomized into three groups: a cognitive-behavioral intervention emphasizing belief disconfirmation (CbI), a behavioral intervention emphasizing exposure (BI), and a control condition. Self-report measures assessing AS, catastrophizing of bodily sensations, and subjective units of distress (SUDS) were collected before, during and after the intervention. Participants also completed online questionnaires at a one-month follow-up. Following the CbI but not BI, a decrease was observed in both AS and catastrophizing interpretations. Furthermore, only the CbI group exhibited a decrease in SUDS ratings, whereas the BI group exhibited a significant increase. Notably, these effects were not maintained at a one-month follow-up. Findings suggest that cognitive interventions without repeated behavioral exposure may be sufficient in reducing self-reported anxiety-related symptoms and catastrophic misinterpretations, though not at maintaining them. This raises questions regarding the role of pure behavioral mechanisms in exposure.
KW - Exposure
KW - anxiety sensitivity
KW - behavioral
KW - cognitive
KW - mechanisms of change
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139799490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/16506073.2022.2109511
DO - 10.1080/16506073.2022.2109511
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 36217830
AN - SCOPUS:85139799490
SN - 1650-6073
VL - 52
SP - 132
EP - 145
JO - Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
JF - Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
IS - 2
ER -