Media Motivation and Elite Rhetoric in Comparative Perspective

Eran Amsalem*, Tamir Sheafer, Stefaan Walgrave, Peter John Loewen, Stuart N. Soroka

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

The exchange of diverse points of view in elite deliberation is considered a cornerstone of democracy. This study presents evidence that variations in political motivation for media use predict the tendency of politicians to present deliberative rhetoric that considers multiple points of view regarding issues and sees those views as related to one another. We surveyed 111 incumbent Members of Parliament in Belgium, Canada, and Israel and analyzed a large sample of their parliamentary speeches. The findings demonstrate that motivation to attain media coverage and act upon information from the news media leads politicians to strategically display simple and unidimensional rhetoric due to newsworthiness considerations, but only in countries where the media constitute important resources for reelection. The results contribute to extant literature by demonstrating a media effect on elite deliberation and by emphasizing the moderating role of political systems on the nature of elite rhetoric.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)385-403
Number of pages19
JournalPolitical Communication
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Jul 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

  • deliberation
  • elite rhetoric
  • integrative complexity
  • media logic
  • political systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Media Motivation and Elite Rhetoric in Comparative Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this