Abstract
The discovery that Ca2+ is necessary for the release of neurotransmitter, the primary means by which nerve cells communicate, led to the calcium hypothesis of neutransmitter release1-4, in which release is initiated after an action potential only by an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration near the release sites and is terminated (1-2 ms) by the rapid removal of Ca2+. Since then, the calcium-voltage hypothesis has been proposed5,6, in which the depolarization of the presynaptic terminals has two functions. First, in common with the calcium hypothesis, the Ca2+ conductance is increased, thereby permitting Ca2+ entry. Second, a confor-mational change is induced in a membrane molecule that renders it sensitive to Ca2+, and then binding of Ca2+ to this active form triggers release of neurotransmitter. When the membrane is repolarized, the molecule is inactivated and release is terminated, regardless of the local Ca2+ concentration at that moment. This hypothesis, in contrast to the calcium hypothesis, accounts for the insensitivity of the time course of release to experimental manipulations of intracellular Ca2+ concentation7-11, Furthermore, it explains rapid termination of release after depolarization, even though Ca2+ concentration may still be high. Here we describe experiments that distinguish between these two hypotheses and find that our results support the calcium voltage hypothesis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 433-435 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Nature |
| Volume | 342 |
| Issue number | 6248 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1989 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Membrane depolarization evokes neurotransmitter release in the absence of calcium entry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver