Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Microarray segmentation methods significantly influence data precision.

  • Ahmed Ashour Ahmed*
  • , Maria Vias
  • , N. Gopalakrishna Iyer
  • , Carlos Caldas
  • , James D. Brenton
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

64 Scopus citations

Abstract

Little consideration has been given to the effect of different segmentation methods on the variability of data derived from microarray images. Previous work has suggested that the significant source of variability from microarray image analysis is from estimation of local background. In this study, we used Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) models to investigate the effect of methods of segmentation on the precision of measurements obtained from replicate microarray experiments. We used four different methods of spot segmentation (adaptive, fixed circle, histogram and GenePix) to analyse a total number of 156 172 spots from 12 microarray experiments. Using a two-way ANOVA model and the coefficient of repeatability, we show that the method of segmentation significantly affects the precision of the microarray data. The histogram method gave the lowest variability across replicate spots compared to other methods, and had the lowest pixel-to-pixel variability within spots. This effect on precision was independent of background subtraction. We show that these findings have direct, practical implications as the variability in precision between the four methods resulted in different numbers of genes being identified as differentially expressed. Segmentation method is an important source of variability in microarray data that directly affects precision and the identification of differentially expressed genes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e50
JournalNucleic Acids Research
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Microarray segmentation methods significantly influence data precision.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this