## Abstract

We focus on a due-date assignment model where due-dates are determined by penalties for jobs exceeding pre-specified (job-dependent, different) deadlines. The underlying assumption of this model, denoted by DIF, is that there are "lead times that customers consider to be reasonable and expected". In a minmax DIF model, the value of the objective function is that of the largest job/due-date cost. The goal is to find both the job sequence and the due-dates, such that this value is minimized. In this paper we study several extensions of the minmax DIF model. First, we consider general position-dependent job processing times. Then we extend the model to a setting of a due-window for acceptable lead-times. Here, the assumption is that a time interval exists, such that due-dates assigned to be within this interval are not penalized. The last extension of the DIF model is to a setting allowing job-rejection. This option reflects many real-life situations, where the scheduler may decide to process only a subset of the jobs, and the rejected jobs are penalized. The first two extensions are shown to be polynomially solvable: we introduce solution algorithms requiring O(n^{3}) and O(n^{4}) time, respectively, where n is the number of jobs. The last extension (assuming job-rejection) is proved to be NP-hard in the ordinary sense, and an efficient pseudo-polynomial dynamic programming algorithm is introduced.

Original language | American English |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 150-156 |

Number of pages | 7 |

Journal | Computers and Operations Research |

Volume | 83 |

DOIs | |

State | Published - 1 Jul 2017 |

### Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:© 2017 Elsevier Ltd

## Keywords

- Due-date assignment
- Job-rejection
- Minmax
- Position-dependent processing times
- Scheduling
- Single machine