Models and fictions: Not so similar after all?

Arnon Levy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


A number of philosophers draw a close analogy between scientific modeling and fiction, often appealing to Kendall Walton’s make-believe view. I assess the models-fictions analogy from a cognitive angle, suggesting that from this perspective it appears relatively weak. More specifically, I argue that, on the one hand, the appeal to Walton is appropriate inasmuch as his view fits well with how modelers employ the imagination. On the other hand, what makes Walton’s view attractive as an account of the cognitive aspects of modeling makes it less attractive as an account of fiction.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)819-828
Number of pages10
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Issue number5
StatePublished - Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
For oral discussion of previous versions of this article, I am grateful to Elijah Milgram, Roman Frigg, and audiences at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the University of Bern, and PSA 2018. My students Aya Evron, Topaz Halperin, Jonathan Najenson, and Nadav Rubinstein gave valuable comments on a draft. Special thanks are owed to Ori Kinberg, for thinking with me about fiction for the past 2 years.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.


Dive into the research topics of 'Models and fictions: Not so similar after all?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this