Modularity of language reconsidered

Yonata Levy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper focuses on claims for the modularity of language that have been voiced within the field of cognitive developmental disorders. It will be argued that, whereas there is sound empirical support for 'little' modularity, i.e., the internal modularity of the grammar, the cases that have been brought up in the literature do not, in fact, provide support for 'Big' Modularity, i.e., the Modularity of the language faculty. The cases discussed are children with William's Syndrome and the retarded individuals studied by Cromer (1993), Curtiss (1979, 1988), Rondal (1993), Smith and Tsimpli (1995), and Yamada (1990). Rather then making the case for Modularity, it is suggested that these individuals' liguistic performance can best be described in terms of uniquely preserved accessing privileges for language which enable them to reach levels of performance that they cannot reach through other modalities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)240-263
Number of pages24
JournalBrain and Language
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1996

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modularity of language reconsidered'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this