Abstract
Despite the affinity of monism and monotheism—and despite monism’s recent philosophical renaissance—few have defended the conjunction of the two claims, of what we might call ‘theistic monism’. I argue, first, that monism and monotheism are consistent, and second, that each one provides good reasons to accept the other one. Monotheists, qua monotheists, have good reason to be monists; and monists, qua monists, have good reason to be monotheists. There should be much greater overlap between the monist camp and the monotheist camp than there is at present.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 423-437 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Philosophy |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Aug 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), 2025.
Keywords
- bottom-up monism
- cosmic monism
- monism
- monotheism
- null individual
- theistic monism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Monism and Monotheism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver