Abstract
Organismal movement is ubiquitous and facilitates important ecological mechanisms that drive community and metacommunity composition and hence biodiversity. In most existing ecological theories and models in biodiversity research, movement is represented simplistically, ignoring the behavioural basis of movement and consequently the variation in behaviour at species and individual levels. However, as human endeavours modify climate and land use, the behavioural processes of organisms in response to these changes, including movement, become critical to understanding the resulting biodiversity loss. Here, we draw together research from different subdisciplines in ecology to understand the impact of individual-level movement processes on community-level patterns in species composition and coexistence. We join the movement ecology framework with the key concepts from metacommunity theory, community assembly and modern coexistence theory using the idea of micro–macro links, where various aspects of emergent movement behaviour scale up to local and regional patterns in species mobility and mobile-link-generated patterns in abiotic and biotic environmental conditions. These in turn influence both individual movement and, at ecological timescales, mechanisms such as dispersal limitation, environmental filtering, and niche partitioning. We conclude by highlighting challenges to and promising future avenues for data generation, data analysis and complementary modelling approaches and provide a brief outlook on how a new behaviour-based view on movement becomes important in understanding the responses of communities under ongoing environmental change.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1073-1096 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Biological Reviews |
Volume | 95 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Aug 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We thank four anonymous reviewers for taking the time carefully to assess our manuscript and for their thoughtful comments, which greatly improved the manuscript. This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the framework of the BioMove Research Training Group (DFG‐GRK 2118/1). M.C.R. acknowledges funding from an ERC Advanced Grant (694368). K.P.‐W. acknowledges funding from BiodivERsA‐BMBF for the project BASIL. R.N. was supported by the Minerva Center for Movement Ecology, the Humboldt Foundation for the Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel Award, the German–Israeli Foundation (GIF 999–66.8/2008, GIF 1316/2015), the German–Israeli Project Cooperation (DIP NA 846/1‐1), and Adelina and Massimo DellaPergola Chair of Life Sciences.
Funding Information:
We thank four anonymous reviewers for taking the time carefully to assess our manuscript and for their thoughtful comments, which greatly improved the manuscript. This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the framework of the BioMove Research Training Group (DFG-GRK 2118/1). M.C.R. acknowledges funding from an ERC Advanced Grant (694368). K.P.-W. acknowledges funding from BiodivERsA-BMBF for the project BASIL. R.N. was supported by the Minerva Center for Movement Ecology, the Humboldt Foundation for the Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel Award, the German?Israeli Foundation (GIF 999?66.8/2008, GIF 1316/2015), the German?Israeli Project Cooperation (DIP NA 846/1-1), and Adelina and Massimo DellaPergola Chair of Life Sciences.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Keywords
- animal movement
- biodiversity
- biotic filter
- dispersal
- environmental filter
- metacommunity
- migration
- mobile links
- nomadism
- species coexistence