TY - JOUR
T1 - Multimodal multicentre investigation of diagnostic and prognostic markers in disorders of consciousness
AU - Manasova, Dragana
AU - Belloli, Laouen Mayal Louan
AU - Rosenfelder, Martin Justinus
AU - Willacker, Lina
AU - Fló Rama, Emilia
AU - Valota, Chiara
AU - Hermann, Bertrand
AU - Kaufmann, Brigitte Charlotte
AU - Pirastru, Alice
AU - Derchi, Chiara Camilla
AU - Raiser, Theresa
AU - Valente, Melanie
AU - Sangare, Aude
AU - Türker, Başak
AU - Pyatigorskaya, Nadya
AU - Béranger, Benoît
AU - Colombo, Michele
AU - Munoz-Musat, Esteban
AU - Escrichs, Anira
AU - Atzori, Tiziana
AU - Baglio, Francesca
AU - Lapa, Constantin
AU - Berlis, Ansgar
AU - Krüger, Kristina
AU - Luther, Tina
AU - Perlbarg, Vincent
AU - Deco, Gustavo
AU - Sanz-Perl, Yonathan
AU - Tagliazucchi, Enzo
AU - Puybasset, Louis
AU - Rohaut, Benjamin
AU - Naccache, Lionel
AU - Comanducci, Angela
AU - Arzi, Anat
AU - Rosanova, Mario
AU - Bender, Andreas
AU - Sitt, Jacobo Diego
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
PY - 2026/4
Y1 - 2026/4
N2 - Severely brain-injured patients may enter a spectrum of conditions collectively known as disorders of consciousness. This spectrum includes clinical conditions such as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or minimally conscious state, where the behavioural assessment of consciousness can often be deceptive. To bridge this dissociation, neuroimaging techniques are employed to identify the residual brain functions. Each neuroimaging modality imperfectly captures distinct aspects of brain preservation—functional, anatomical, or both. In this study, we adopt a comprehensive approach by integrating the neurophysiology and neuroimaging modalities available from the standard and advanced clinical assessments through interpretable machine learning. The electrophysiological modalities included high-density EEG (resting state and task), whereas neuroimaging modalities included anatomical and resting-state functional MRI, diffusion MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Our investigation reveals that specific modalities, such as functional assessments, provide comprehensive insights into the currently evaluated state of consciousness, the diagnosis of the patients. Conversely, structural modalities offer valuable information about the patient's evolution within the consciousness spectrum. We validate the proposed analysis with data coming from other centres with different acquisition parameters. Importantly, we demonstrate that model performance improves with an increase in the number of modalities. We observe a higher inter-modality disagreement for minimally conscious state patients and those patients who improve. Lastly, we observe a difference in feature importances between diagnosis and prognosis, with an interaction between modality and anatomical structures: some subcortical markers tend to contribute more to prognosis, while other cortical markers are more informative for diagnosis. This integrative multimodal and machine learning methodology presents a promising avenue for a more nuanced understanding of disorders of consciousness, contributing to enhanced diagnostic precision, prognostic capabilities and the personalization of rehabilitative strategies in clinical practice.
AB - Severely brain-injured patients may enter a spectrum of conditions collectively known as disorders of consciousness. This spectrum includes clinical conditions such as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or minimally conscious state, where the behavioural assessment of consciousness can often be deceptive. To bridge this dissociation, neuroimaging techniques are employed to identify the residual brain functions. Each neuroimaging modality imperfectly captures distinct aspects of brain preservation—functional, anatomical, or both. In this study, we adopt a comprehensive approach by integrating the neurophysiology and neuroimaging modalities available from the standard and advanced clinical assessments through interpretable machine learning. The electrophysiological modalities included high-density EEG (resting state and task), whereas neuroimaging modalities included anatomical and resting-state functional MRI, diffusion MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Our investigation reveals that specific modalities, such as functional assessments, provide comprehensive insights into the currently evaluated state of consciousness, the diagnosis of the patients. Conversely, structural modalities offer valuable information about the patient's evolution within the consciousness spectrum. We validate the proposed analysis with data coming from other centres with different acquisition parameters. Importantly, we demonstrate that model performance improves with an increase in the number of modalities. We observe a higher inter-modality disagreement for minimally conscious state patients and those patients who improve. Lastly, we observe a difference in feature importances between diagnosis and prognosis, with an interaction between modality and anatomical structures: some subcortical markers tend to contribute more to prognosis, while other cortical markers are more informative for diagnosis. This integrative multimodal and machine learning methodology presents a promising avenue for a more nuanced understanding of disorders of consciousness, contributing to enhanced diagnostic precision, prognostic capabilities and the personalization of rehabilitative strategies in clinical practice.
KW - disorders of consciousness
KW - electrophysiology
KW - machine learning
KW - multimodal
KW - neuroimaging
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035240191
U2 - 10.1093/brain/awaf412
DO - 10.1093/brain/awaf412
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 41499248
AN - SCOPUS:105035240191
SN - 0006-8950
VL - 149
SP - 1381
EP - 1395
JO - Brain
JF - Brain
IS - 4
ER -