TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples
AU - Halamová, Júlia
AU - Kanovský, Martin
AU - Gilbert, Paul
AU - Troop, Nicholas A.
AU - Zuroff, David C.
AU - Petrocchi, Nicola
AU - Hermanto, Nicola
AU - Krieger, Tobias
AU - Kirby, James N.
AU - Asano, Kenichi
AU - Matos, Marcela
AU - Yu, Fu Ya
AU - Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion
AU - Shahar, Ben
AU - Basran, Jaskaran
AU - Kupeli, Nuriye
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples (N = 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism.
AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples (N = 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism.
KW - Cross-cultural studies
KW - Differential test functioning
KW - Measurement invariance
KW - Self-criticism
KW - Self-reassurance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065208849&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1
DO - 10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85065208849
SN - 0894-9085
VL - 37
SP - 411
EP - 444
JO - Journal of Rational - Emotive and Cognitive - Behavior Therapy
JF - Journal of Rational - Emotive and Cognitive - Behavior Therapy
IS - 4
ER -