TY - JOUR
T1 - Nanocrystal Compressive Residual Stresses
T2 - A Strategy to Strengthen the Bony Spines of Osteocytic and Anosteocytic Fish
AU - Silveira, Andreia
AU - Davydok, Anton
AU - Krywka, Christina
AU - Scheel, Mario
AU - Weitkamp, Timm
AU - Fleck, Claudia
AU - Shahar, Ron
AU - Zaslansky, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Advanced Science published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Bone is a living tissue in which communicating cells, osteocytes, are assumed to be vital for tissue turnover and adaptation. Interestingly however, most advanced teleost fish do not possess osteocyte-mediated porosity, prompting intriguing questions about alternative material-strategies for these bones to cope with damage. Using advanced imaging techniques, including phase-contrast enhanced (PCE) microtomography (µCT) and nanotomography (nanoCT), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and diffraction (XRD) tomography, the micro- and nano-architectures of osteocytic zebrafish are compared with anosteocytic medaka fishbone. PCE µCT and Zernike phase-contrast nanoCT showed a lack of porosity in medaka bone and 0.75 – 2.26% osteocytic porosity in zebrafish. Both fish species have similar mineralized collagen fibril arrangements containing calcium (Ca) and traces of strontium (Sr) with increased zinc (Zn) localized on the outer bone regions. Medaka bones exhibit reduced apatite nanocrystal lattice spacings on the outer surfaces. Indeed we find higher compressive residual strains (-0.100 ± 0.02) compared to zebrafish (-0.071 ± 0.03). We propose that medaka bone evolved to replace the mechanosensitive osteocytic network by entrapping protective residual strains between collagen nanofibers and mineral crystals. These strains may enhance fracture toughness while making this nanocomposite well-suited for sustaining repeated loading cycles, thus reducing the metabolic costs associated with housing a large network of cells.
AB - Bone is a living tissue in which communicating cells, osteocytes, are assumed to be vital for tissue turnover and adaptation. Interestingly however, most advanced teleost fish do not possess osteocyte-mediated porosity, prompting intriguing questions about alternative material-strategies for these bones to cope with damage. Using advanced imaging techniques, including phase-contrast enhanced (PCE) microtomography (µCT) and nanotomography (nanoCT), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and diffraction (XRD) tomography, the micro- and nano-architectures of osteocytic zebrafish are compared with anosteocytic medaka fishbone. PCE µCT and Zernike phase-contrast nanoCT showed a lack of porosity in medaka bone and 0.75 – 2.26% osteocytic porosity in zebrafish. Both fish species have similar mineralized collagen fibril arrangements containing calcium (Ca) and traces of strontium (Sr) with increased zinc (Zn) localized on the outer bone regions. Medaka bones exhibit reduced apatite nanocrystal lattice spacings on the outer surfaces. Indeed we find higher compressive residual strains (-0.100 ± 0.02) compared to zebrafish (-0.071 ± 0.03). We propose that medaka bone evolved to replace the mechanosensitive osteocytic network by entrapping protective residual strains between collagen nanofibers and mineral crystals. These strains may enhance fracture toughness while making this nanocomposite well-suited for sustaining repeated loading cycles, thus reducing the metabolic costs associated with housing a large network of cells.
KW - anosteocytic and osteocytic bone material
KW - nanobeam diffraction/fluorescence imaging
KW - nanocomposite compressive residual stresses
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002400152&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/advs.202410617
DO - 10.1002/advs.202410617
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 40213975
AN - SCOPUS:105002400152
SN - 2198-3844
JO - Advanced Science
JF - Advanced Science
ER -