Natural Liberation in the Sāṃkhyakārikā and Its Commentaries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The subject of this article is the concept of natural liberation in classical Sāṃkhya. On the basis of the Sāṃkhyakārikā by Īśvaraka and its traditional commentaries, I will attempt to demonstrate that liberation from suffering in Sāṃkhya is not the result of rational inquiry—the prevailing view among contemporary scholars. The Sāṃkhya does not necessarily prescribe yogic practice as argued by other scholars. Instead, I will defend a position expressed by K.C. Bhattacharyya and Frank R. Podgorski, according to which liberation in classical Sāṃkhya is a natural and spontaneous process of suffering transforming into its own cure. I will argue that although traditional authorities may disagree over the form the liberating process takes on the phenomenal level (as yogic practice, instruction from a teacher, etc.), there is a general agreement that the natural forces are the primary drives and agents of liberation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)863-892
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Indian Philosophy
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Keywords

  • K.C. Bhattacharyya
  • Natural Liberation
  • Sāṃkhya
  • Sāṃkhyakārikā
  • Yoga

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Natural Liberation in the Sāṃkhyakārikā and Its Commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this