Abstract
The subject of this article is the concept of natural liberation in classical Sāṃkhya. On the basis of the Sāṃkhyakārikā by Īśvaraka and its traditional commentaries, I will attempt to demonstrate that liberation from suffering in Sāṃkhya is not the result of rational inquiry—the prevailing view among contemporary scholars. The Sāṃkhya does not necessarily prescribe yogic practice as argued by other scholars. Instead, I will defend a position expressed by K.C. Bhattacharyya and Frank R. Podgorski, according to which liberation in classical Sāṃkhya is a natural and spontaneous process of suffering transforming into its own cure. I will argue that although traditional authorities may disagree over the form the liberating process takes on the phenomenal level (as yogic practice, instruction from a teacher, etc.), there is a general agreement that the natural forces are the primary drives and agents of liberation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 863-892 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Journal of Indian Philosophy |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Nov 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Keywords
- K.C. Bhattacharyya
- Natural Liberation
- Sāṃkhya
- Sāṃkhyakārikā
- Yoga
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Natural Liberation in the Sāṃkhyakārikā and Its Commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver