Natural Resources, Technology Improvements, and Growth

Fidel Perez-Sebastian, Ohad Raveh*, Frederick van der Ploeg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We study, analytically and empirically, how technological changes affect the nexus between resource abundance and economic growth. Our two-sector model indicates that capital-augmenting technological improvements can be contemporaneously contractionary in resource-rich economies, and expansionary elsewhere, due to differences in the size of the elasticity of substitution between labor and capital. In addition, such improvements yield relatively steeper expansionary patterns in resource-rich economies in the longer run. We test these predictions using a panel of U.S. states and counties. Our identification strategy rests on geographically-entrenched differences in resource endowments, and the adoption of plausibly exogenous technology shocks at the national level. Our core estimates corroborate our predictions. First, we document persistent differences in the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor across the natural-resource dimension. Second, we find that an increase in TFP is on impact contractionary in resource-rich states, but is non-contractionary (at worst) in resource-poor ones. Third, we illustrate that in the longer term a positive technology shock expands output and inputs in resource-rich economies relatively more strongly. Our results shed light on hitherto overlooked potential adverse effects of natural resource abundance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2157-2199
Number of pages43
JournalEnvironmental and Resource Economics
Volume88
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

  • Input elasticities
  • Natural resource abundance
  • Technology shocks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Natural Resources, Technology Improvements, and Growth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this