Abstract
The Agricultural Revolution and plant domestication in the Near East (among its components) have fascinated generations of scholars. Here, we narrate the history of ideas underlying plant domestication research since the late 19th century. Biological and cultural perspectives are presented through two prevailing models: one views plant domestication as a protracted, unconscious evolutionary mutualistic (noncentric) process. The second advocates a punctuated, knowledge-based human initiative (centric). We scrutinize the research landscape while assessing the underlying evolutionary and cultural mechanisms. A parsimony measure indicates that the punctuated-centric view better accords with archaeological records, and the geobotany and biology of the species, and requires fewer assumptions. The protracted alternative requires many assumptions, does not account for legume biology, fails to distinguish domestication from postdomestication changes, and, therefore, is less parsimonious.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 491-511 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Trends in Plant Science |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
- circumstantial domestication
- core area-one event domestication
- crop evolution
- evolutionary continuum
- origin of agriculture in the Near East