TY - JOUR
T1 - Near-far search
T2 - An evolutionarily stable foraging strategy
AU - Motro, Uzi
AU - Shmida, Avi
PY - 1995
Y1 - 1995
N2 - This study addresses the momentary rules of nectar foraging behavior on carpet-type, small inflorescences. It has been suggested that patchiness in the distribution of nectar can give an advantage to “near-far” type of foraging strategies; that is, to foragers which search “near” (in the neighborhood of the last visited flower) as long as the nectar yield is high enough and go “far” otherwise. To explore the evolutionary stability of near-far search, various foraging strategies were compared, according to two, slightly different optimality criteria: the number of flowers emptied during a fixed length bout and the number of flowers visited until total extraction of the entire inflorescence. With long bouts (in the case of a single forager) or a substantial probability of revisits to the same inflorescence (in the case of multiple foragers), a near-far foraging strategy is an ESS. Furthermore, prior patchiness in the nectar distribution is not a necessary condition for the evolutionary stability of near-far search. It turns out that during near-far foraging some patchiness is created by the foraging process itself, which the near-far forager can exploit later on.
AB - This study addresses the momentary rules of nectar foraging behavior on carpet-type, small inflorescences. It has been suggested that patchiness in the distribution of nectar can give an advantage to “near-far” type of foraging strategies; that is, to foragers which search “near” (in the neighborhood of the last visited flower) as long as the nectar yield is high enough and go “far” otherwise. To explore the evolutionary stability of near-far search, various foraging strategies were compared, according to two, slightly different optimality criteria: the number of flowers emptied during a fixed length bout and the number of flowers visited until total extraction of the entire inflorescence. With long bouts (in the case of a single forager) or a substantial probability of revisits to the same inflorescence (in the case of multiple foragers), a near-far foraging strategy is an ESS. Furthermore, prior patchiness in the nectar distribution is not a necessary condition for the evolutionary stability of near-far search. It turns out that during near-far foraging some patchiness is created by the foraging process itself, which the near-far forager can exploit later on.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028987534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0038
DO - 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0038
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0028987534
SN - 0022-5193
VL - 173
SP - 15
EP - 22
JO - Journal of Theoretical Biology
JF - Journal of Theoretical Biology
IS - 1
ER -