TY - JOUR
T1 - Nectar and honeydew feeding of Phlebotomus papatasi in a focus of Leishmania major in Neot Hakikar oasis
AU - Müller, Günter
AU - Schlein, Yosef
PY - 2004/6
Y1 - 2004/6
N2 - Feeding of Phlebotomus papatasi Seopoli on nectar and honeydew was investigated in Neot Hakikar, an oasis in the southern Jordan Valley. Sand flies were caught with miniature light traps in cleared areas with large Tamarix nilotica Bunge bushes, in colonies of the sandrat Psammomys obesus Cretzschmar. Fly series were trapped and compared according to the condition of T. nilotica bushes: with flowers, soiled with honeydew excreted by cicadas, or without flowers. Near flowering bushes the catch was live times greater (7.9: 1.6 flies/trap) and the proportion of sugar-positive flies was also much greater (49.9: 17.3%) than near bushes without flowers. The catch was three times greater (6.6:2.2 flies/trap) near cicada-infested than near uninfested bushes. Color markers within the gut, obtained from infested or uninfested bushes that had been sprayed with food dye, indicated feeding of 33.2% and 4.5% of these series, respectively. Sand flies were strongly attracted to flowers of T. nilotica. In similar trap series, those haited with flowering branches caught 231 flies, whereas with baits of honeydew-soiled branches, control regular branches or wet filter paper, the catch ranged between 11 to 15 flies. This study is the first evidence of nectar feeding by sand flies in the field and it indicates that nectar may be an important and an attractive source of sugar.
AB - Feeding of Phlebotomus papatasi Seopoli on nectar and honeydew was investigated in Neot Hakikar, an oasis in the southern Jordan Valley. Sand flies were caught with miniature light traps in cleared areas with large Tamarix nilotica Bunge bushes, in colonies of the sandrat Psammomys obesus Cretzschmar. Fly series were trapped and compared according to the condition of T. nilotica bushes: with flowers, soiled with honeydew excreted by cicadas, or without flowers. Near flowering bushes the catch was live times greater (7.9: 1.6 flies/trap) and the proportion of sugar-positive flies was also much greater (49.9: 17.3%) than near bushes without flowers. The catch was three times greater (6.6:2.2 flies/trap) near cicada-infested than near uninfested bushes. Color markers within the gut, obtained from infested or uninfested bushes that had been sprayed with food dye, indicated feeding of 33.2% and 4.5% of these series, respectively. Sand flies were strongly attracted to flowers of T. nilotica. In similar trap series, those haited with flowering branches caught 231 flies, whereas with baits of honeydew-soiled branches, control regular branches or wet filter paper, the catch ranged between 11 to 15 flies. This study is the first evidence of nectar feeding by sand flies in the field and it indicates that nectar may be an important and an attractive source of sugar.
KW - Honeydew
KW - Nectar
KW - Sand fly sugar-feeding
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3442890648&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 15266752
AN - SCOPUS:3442890648
SN - 1081-1710
VL - 29
SP - 154
EP - 158
JO - Journal of Vector Ecology
JF - Journal of Vector Ecology
IS - 1
ER -