TY - JOUR
T1 - Negotiating the energy transition
T2 - Governance trade-offs in solar deployment
AU - Eitan, Avri
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - While solar photovoltaic (PV) energy plays a central role in global decarbonization efforts, its large-scale deployment involves complex governance trade-offs related to land use, market design, regulatory coordination, and stakeholder engagement that demand negotiation among diverse actors. This study investigates how solar transitions are governed through dynamic interactions among multiple actors. Grounded in a dynamic governance lens, the study explores how regulatory frameworks evolve in response to shifting technological, economic, and political pressures. Using a qualitative case study of Israel, the paper examines four key arenas of negotiation: utility control versus market liberalization, intergovernmental tensions over policy instruments, regulatory–market interactions around investment certainty, and environmental and community responses to infrastructure siting. While grounded in the Israeli context, the findings offer broader insights into solar governance: it is not a linear, technocratic process, but a dynamic negotiation among institutions and stakeholders—shaping whose interests prevail and how energy transitions unfold.
AB - While solar photovoltaic (PV) energy plays a central role in global decarbonization efforts, its large-scale deployment involves complex governance trade-offs related to land use, market design, regulatory coordination, and stakeholder engagement that demand negotiation among diverse actors. This study investigates how solar transitions are governed through dynamic interactions among multiple actors. Grounded in a dynamic governance lens, the study explores how regulatory frameworks evolve in response to shifting technological, economic, and political pressures. Using a qualitative case study of Israel, the paper examines four key arenas of negotiation: utility control versus market liberalization, intergovernmental tensions over policy instruments, regulatory–market interactions around investment certainty, and environmental and community responses to infrastructure siting. While grounded in the Israeli context, the findings offer broader insights into solar governance: it is not a linear, technocratic process, but a dynamic negotiation among institutions and stakeholders—shaping whose interests prevail and how energy transitions unfold.
KW - Dynamic governance
KW - Energy transition
KW - Governance trade-offs
KW - Photovoltaics
KW - Solar energy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012596168
U2 - 10.1016/j.esr.2025.101854
DO - 10.1016/j.esr.2025.101854
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:105012596168
SN - 2211-467X
VL - 61
JO - Energy Strategy Reviews
JF - Energy Strategy Reviews
M1 - 101854
ER -