Abstract
This Perspective addresses ambiguities in designations of "new drugs" intended as new therapeutic entities (NTEs). Designation of an NTE as a new drug is significant, as it may confer regulatory exclusivity, an important incentive for development of novel compounds. Such designations differ between jurisdictions according to their drug laws and drug regulations. Chemical, biological, and innovative drugs are addressed in turn. The terms new chemical entity (NCE), new molecular entity (NME), new active substance (NAS), and new biological entity (NBE) as applied in worldwide jurisdictions are clarified. Differences between them are explored through case studies showing why new drugs have different periods of exclusivity in different jurisdictions or none at all. Finally, this Perspective recommends that in future, for the purpose of new drug compilations, NME is used for a new chemical drug, NBE for a new biological drug, and the combined designation NTE should refer to either an NME or an NBE.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 8729-8765 |
| Number of pages | 37 |
| Journal | Journal of Medicinal Chemistry |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 21 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 13 Nov 2014 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2014 American Chemical Society.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"New drug" designations for new therapeutic entities: New active substance, new chemical entity, new biological entity, new molecular entity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver