TY - GEN
T1 - Non-commutative circuits and the sum-of-squares problem
AU - Hrubeš, Pavel
AU - Wigderson, Avi
AU - Yehudayoff, Amir
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - We initiate a direction for proving lower bounds on the size of non-commutative arithmetic circuits. This direction is based on a connection between lower bounds on the size of non-commutative arithmetic circuits and a problem about commutative degree four polynomials, the classical sum-of-squares problem: find the smallest n such that there exists an identity (x 12+x22+⋯ + xk 2)·(y12+y2 2+⋯ + yk2)= f1 2+f22+ ⋯ +fn2, where each fi = fi(X,Y) is bilinear in X={x 1,... ,xk} and Y={y1,..., yk}. Over the complex numbers, we show that a sufficiently strong super-linear lower bound on n in, namely, n ≥ k1+∈ with ε >0, implies an exponential lower bound on the size of arithmetic circuits computing the non-commutative permanent. More generally, we consider such sum-of-squares identities for any M polynomial h(X,Y), namely: h(X,Y) = f1 2+f22+⋯+fn2. Again, proving n ≥ k1+∈ in for any explicit h over the complex numbers gives an exponential lower bound for the non-commutative permanent. Our proofs relies on several new structure theorems for non-commutative circuits, as well as a non-commutative analog of Valiant's completeness of the permanent. We proceed to prove such super-linear bounds in some restricted cases. We prove that n ≥ Ω(k6/5) in (1), if f1,..., fn are required to have integer coefficients. Over the real numbers, we construct an explicit M polynomial h such that n in (2) must be at least Ω(k2). Unfortunately, these results do not imply circuit lower bounds. We also present other structural results about non-commutative arithmetic circuits. We show that any non-commutative circuit computing an ordered non-commutative polynomial can be efficiently transformed to a syntactically multilinear circuit computing that polynomial. The permanent, for example, is ordered. Hence, lower bounds on the size of syntactically multilinear circuits computing the permanent imply unrestricted non-commutative lower bounds. We also prove an exponential lower bound on the size of non-commutative syntactically multilinear circuit computing an explicit polynomial. This polynomial is, however, not ordered and an unrestricted circuit lower bound does not follow.
AB - We initiate a direction for proving lower bounds on the size of non-commutative arithmetic circuits. This direction is based on a connection between lower bounds on the size of non-commutative arithmetic circuits and a problem about commutative degree four polynomials, the classical sum-of-squares problem: find the smallest n such that there exists an identity (x 12+x22+⋯ + xk 2)·(y12+y2 2+⋯ + yk2)= f1 2+f22+ ⋯ +fn2, where each fi = fi(X,Y) is bilinear in X={x 1,... ,xk} and Y={y1,..., yk}. Over the complex numbers, we show that a sufficiently strong super-linear lower bound on n in, namely, n ≥ k1+∈ with ε >0, implies an exponential lower bound on the size of arithmetic circuits computing the non-commutative permanent. More generally, we consider such sum-of-squares identities for any M polynomial h(X,Y), namely: h(X,Y) = f1 2+f22+⋯+fn2. Again, proving n ≥ k1+∈ in for any explicit h over the complex numbers gives an exponential lower bound for the non-commutative permanent. Our proofs relies on several new structure theorems for non-commutative circuits, as well as a non-commutative analog of Valiant's completeness of the permanent. We proceed to prove such super-linear bounds in some restricted cases. We prove that n ≥ Ω(k6/5) in (1), if f1,..., fn are required to have integer coefficients. Over the real numbers, we construct an explicit M polynomial h such that n in (2) must be at least Ω(k2). Unfortunately, these results do not imply circuit lower bounds. We also present other structural results about non-commutative arithmetic circuits. We show that any non-commutative circuit computing an ordered non-commutative polynomial can be efficiently transformed to a syntactically multilinear circuit computing that polynomial. The permanent, for example, is ordered. Hence, lower bounds on the size of syntactically multilinear circuits computing the permanent imply unrestricted non-commutative lower bounds. We also prove an exponential lower bound on the size of non-commutative syntactically multilinear circuit computing an explicit polynomial. This polynomial is, however, not ordered and an unrestricted circuit lower bound does not follow.
KW - algebraic complexity
KW - lower bounds
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954739292&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/1806689.1806781
DO - 10.1145/1806689.1806781
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:77954739292
SN - 9781605588179
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
SP - 667
EP - 676
BT - STOC'10 - Proceedings of the 2010 ACM International Symposium on Theory of Computing
T2 - 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2010
Y2 - 5 June 2010 through 8 June 2010
ER -