Abstract
Goals can determine what people want to feel (e.g., Tamir et al., 2008), but can they do so even when they are primed outside of conscious awareness? In two studies, participants wanted to feel significantly less angry after they were implicitly primed with a collaboration goal, compared to a neutral prime. These effects were found with different implicit priming manipulations, direct and indirect measures of emotional preferences, and when controlling for concurrent emotional experiences. The effects were obtained in social contexts in which the potential for collaboration was relatively higher (Study 1) and lower (Study 2). Also, similar effects were found when collaboration was activated nonconsciously (Studies 1-2) and consciously (Study 2). By showing that nonconscious goals can shape emotional preferences, we demonstrate that what people want to feel can be determined by factors they are unaware of.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 292-297 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
Volume | 49 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2013 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by a National Science Foundation grant ( SES 0920918 ) to Maya Tamir. The authors wish to thank Dr. Ran R. Hassin for helpful comments on earlier drafts.
Keywords
- Anger
- Automaticity
- Emotion regulation
- Emotions
- Motivation
- Nonconscious goals